Prismona

Team chemistry

Paste blueprint codes. Understand team chemistry.

Two or more share codes — cofounders, a project squad, a leadership team — and the composition evidence does the rest: trait diversity, who covers what, where the single points of failure sit, and the two gates worth respecting before you commit. Codes only; nobody's answers, nobody's identity.

II.

Compose a team

The reverse direction: pick the outcome, the team shape, and the headcount — and get the seat-by-seat personality composition the evidence favors, in priority order.

Project outcome
Team topology
Members

0→1 Launch, stream-aligned shape, 4 seats — priority order below; cut from the bottom, never the anchor.

1 · Vision & velocity lead
The Catalyst. Someone has to convert an idea into believers and momentum — high Openness with social force is the launch engine.
2 · Systems builder
The Architect. The machine behind the demo: imagination disciplined by structure so the prototype survives contact with users.
3 · Closer
The Driver. Deals, deadlines, and decisions under ambiguity — the outcome-hungry seat that turns interest into revenue.
4 · Trust & ops anchor
The Steward. The integrity layer: promises kept, money clean, the seat every early team skips and regrets (Pletzer et al., 2019).

Composition gates, applied forward: never assemble without a high Honesty-Humility anchor, and never let a majority run low on Conscientiousness — these are the two pairings the evidence flags hardest (Pletzer et al., 2019; Bell, 2007; McCarthy et al., 2023).

Topology lens: Stream-aligned — One team, one flow of work, end to end (Skelton & Pais, Team Topologies (2019)). Archetypes are hiring priors for conversations, never filters on people.